Home / Misclassification Lawyer in Bellevue
If your employer calls you an “independent contractor,” pays you on a 1099, or labels you as an exempt employee, that does not necessarily mean you are legally an independent contractor or exempt from wage protections under federal and state laws. In Washington, the actual nature of your working relationship matters. An employer generally cannot avoid its legal obligations simply by giving you a particular job title or having you sign an agreement saying you are an independent contractor.
At the James Hawkins Firm, we have been protecting employees’ rights for more than 25 years. We understand that employers sometimes use classification structures that shift costs and responsibilities onto workers while reducing the wages and benefits employees would otherwise be entitled to receive. We know the tactics employers use, and we won’t hesitate to challenge them when workers have been improperly classified.
If you believe you have been misclassified, our employment attorneys can examine how you actually performed your job, how your employer treated you, how you were paid, and whether the classification complied with applicable Washington and federal law during a free consultation.
Employee misclassification occurs when a worker is incorrectly treated as something other than an employee for purposes of applicable wage and employment laws. One common example is classifying a worker as an independent contractor when, in reality, the worker functions like an employee. Another situation involves treating an employee as “exempt” from overtime requirements when the employee does not actually satisfy the legal requirements for an exemption. Misclassification can have significant financial consequences. Employees who are improperly classified may lose overtime pay, minimum-wage protections, paid sick leave, reimbursement of certain business expenses, workers’ compensation protections, and other rights and benefits, depending on the circumstances and the laws that apply. Importantly, simply receiving a 1099 does not automatically make someone an independent contractor. The classification depends on legal requirements and the actual relationship between the worker and the company, not simply how the employer chooses to pay the worker.
Misclassification can significantly benefit employers financially. When a company treats a worker as an independent contractor rather than an employee, it may shift certain costs and responsibilities to the worker. Depending on the circumstances, this can include avoiding overtime obligations, reducing payroll-related costs, shifting business expenses to workers, and avoiding other obligations associated with having employees. The result can be especially significant when a worker regularly works more than 40 hours but is told overtime does not apply because they are a “contractor.” A worker may also be required to follow a company’s schedule, policies, procedures, pricing structure, and instructions while simultaneously being told that they are running their own independent business.
At the James Hawkins Firm, we understand the arguments employers may use to defend their classification decisions. We know how companies structure their policies, contracts, pay practices, and job classifications. More importantly, we look beyond the labels and examine the realities of your work. We know the tactics employers use, and we won’t hesitate to challenge those practices when employees have been denied the wages and protections they legally deserve.
One of the most important parts of evaluating a misclassification claim is understanding what you actually did in your position. An employer may describe you as a “consultant,” “manager,” “contractor,” “sales representative,” “technician,” or another title, but the title alone does not determine your legal status. What matters is the reality of your working relationship with the company.
Our attorneys closely review the economic realities of your work to determine whether you were truly operating an independent business or functioning as an employee. We examine who controlled when, where, and how you worked, whether the company determined your schedule or working hours, whether you could set your own rates, and whether you had a genuine opportunity to increase your profits through independent business decisions.
We also consider whether you had your own customers, operated an independent business, invested your own money in equipment or other business expenses, hired your own workers, or were free to work for competing companies. Other important considerations may include the length and permanence of your relationship with the company, your economic dependence on the company, whether the work you performed was an integral part of its regular business, and the degree to which the company supervised or directed your work.
To fully understand your circumstances, we may review your job duties, work schedules, compensation records, contracts, time records, company policies, communications, expense records, and other evidence relevant to your classification. We may also examine how the employer classified and treated other workers performing similar jobs.
Misclassification can leave workers without thousands of dollars in wages they should have received. If you were improperly classified, you may have worked long hours without receiving overtime, covered expenses that should have been reimbursed, or missed out on other compensation required under Washington law.
Depending on the circumstances, you may be able to recover unpaid overtime, minimum wages, unpaid regular wages, compensation related to certain missed meal or rest periods, qualifying business expenses, statutory damages or penalties, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs where allowed by law. Washington law may also provide an important additional remedy in certain wage cases. Under RCW 49.52.070, an employer that willfully withholds wages in violation of RCW 49.52.050 may be liable for twice the amount of wages unlawfully withheld, in addition to attorneys’ fees and costs. Whether double damages are available depends on the specific facts of the case, including whether the employer’s conduct was willful and intended to deprive the employee of wages. How much you may be owed depends on your individual circumstances, including the hours you worked, how you were paid, how long you worked under the disputed classification, and the specific wage laws that apply to your situation. Even seemingly small amounts of unpaid wages can add up significantly when an unlawful practice continues for months or years.
For example, a worker who regularly puts in 50 or 60 hours each week but receives no overtime may be missing a substantial amount of compensation over time. If the applicable law permits double damages, the potential recovery could be considerably greater than the unpaid wages alone. Our attorneys can review your work history and pay practices to determine whether you may have a claim, what wages you may have been denied, and whether enhanced damages, including double damages under Washington law, may be available.
Sometimes what initially appears to be an individual wage problem is actually part of a much larger company-wide practice. For example, an employer may classify an entire group of workers as independent contractors, classify everyone in a particular position as exempt, or maintain a standardized pay policy that results in employees working substantial amounts of unpaid overtime. When we identify evidence that other employees may have experienced the same violation, we investigate whether the matter may be appropriate for a larger group action.
The James Hawkins Firm has long led employment class action litigation. We have spent more than 25 years protecting employees’ rights and pursuing claims involving widespread workplace violations. Our attorneys understand how to investigate whether an employer’s practices affect a larger group of employees and determine the appropriate legal strategy. If we find that you are part of a larger group of workers subjected to the same unlawful practice, we can pursue a class or collective action on behalf of eligible employees when legally appropriate. A class or collective action can give employees a way to stand together when the same employer practice has affected many workers. Instead of treating each employee’s experience as an isolated incident, a larger case can address the underlying company-wide policy or practice.
Employers and their attorneys may argue that workers voluntarily agreed to be independent contractors, that employees understood their classification, or that a written agreement controls the relationship. But signing an agreement does not necessarily resolve the legal question. The real-world relationship between the worker and the company can be critical. That is why we do not simply accept an employer’s characterization of your position. We investigate the facts and examine the economic realities of your work. For more than 25 years, the James Hawkins Firm has stood up for employees and challenged unlawful employment practices. We understand that going up against an employer can feel intimidating, particularly when the company has significant financial and legal resources behind it. You do not have to figure out the legal issues alone.
If you have been improperly classified as an independent contractor or exempt employee, it may be worth having an experienced employment attorney evaluate your situation. Bring whatever information you have available, including your employment agreement, pay records, time records, job description, communications with your employer, and information about the hours you worked. You do not need to determine for yourself whether you were legally misclassified. That is part of what our attorneys can evaluate at no cost.
At the James Hawkins Firm, we protect employees’ rights and pursue the wages and other relief they may be entitled to under applicable law. If your situation appears to be part of a broader company practice, we can also investigate whether other employees were affected and whether a class or collective action may be appropriate. Let us examine the facts, evaluate your classification, and determine what legal options may be available to you.
Call Us Today (949) 387 – 7200
Christina Lucio is the lawyer who was appointed to my case and with everything that has gone on with me personally and the case itself she had maintained communication and was able to make it right without me having to ask. For that I appreciate her and this firm. Definitely recommend to family and friends so why not to my google family.
Yeah they’re great
Nice people and they found things apart from wrongful termination
They handled my case and were very upfront and helpful. Like all cases it took time but I am very happy with how everything turned out. I recommend them.