Solicite una consulta
When employers violate workplace leave laws, employees may have legal rights and remedies. This can include situations involving denied or unpaid sick leave, retaliation for taking protected leave, or an employer’s failure to honor promised vacation or PTO benefits.
At the James Hawkins Firm, we represent employees throughout Washington in employment and wage and hour disputes involving workplace leave and other employment-law issues. For more than 25 years, our attorneys have helped employees understand their rights and pursue the compensation and other remedies available under Washington law. If you believe your workplace leave rights have been violated, contact the James Hawkins Firm today for a free consultation. We can review the circumstances, identify the laws that may apply, and help you understand your legal options.
Washington law requires most employers to provide paid sick leave to eligible employees. Under Washington’s Paid Sick Leave Law, covered employees generally accrue at least one hour of paid sick leave for every 40 hours worked, subject to applicable exemptions. Employees generally may use accrued paid sick leave for qualifying purposes, including:
Washington law also generally requires employers to carry over unused paid sick leave balances of 40 hours or less into the following accrual year. Employers may sometimes provide benefits that are more generous than the statutory minimum.
An employer generally cannot simply disregard an employee’s rights under Washington’s Paid Sick Leave Law. Employers may be prohibited from disciplining, discriminating against, or retaliating against employees for lawfully exercising their right to paid sick leave. Authorized paid sick leave also generally cannot be counted as an absence for purposes of discipline. Depending on the circumstances, prohibited adverse employment actions may include:
For example, if an employee lawfully uses paid sick leave and the employer then cuts the employee’s hours, changes the employee’s schedule as punishment, disciplines the employee, or terminates the employee, the circumstances may warrant an employment-law investigation. If you believe your employer punished you for using paid sick leave, schedule a free consultation with the James Hawkins Firm. We can review what happened and help determine whether the facts may support a legal claim.
Washington employees may also have rights under several different laws when they need time away from work to care for a family member, bond with a new child, or address certain family-related circumstances. Two important protections are the Washington Family Care Act y Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML).
Washington’s Family Care Act may allow eligible employees to use certain types of earned paid leave to care for qualifying family members under the law. Depending on the circumstances, qualifying leave may include paid sick leave, vacation, PTO, and other available paid leave. Whether the Family Care Act applies depends on the circumstances, including the family member involved, the reason for the absence, and the type of paid leave available. If your employer denied your request to use available paid leave to care for a qualifying family member, contact the James Hawkins Firm for a free consultation.
Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) program is separate from an employer’s vacation or PTO policy and from Washington’s paid sick leave requirements. PFML may provide eligible employees with partial wage replacement for qualifying family and medical events. Depending on the circumstances, qualifying events may include:
Eligibility, benefit amounts, and benefit duration depend on the employee’s circumstances and the requirements of the PFML program.
The Family Care Act and PFML serve different purposes. The Family Care Act generally concerns an employee’s use of available paid leave. PFML, meanwhile, is a state program that may provide eligible employees with partial wage replacement for qualifying family and medical leave. In some situations, more than one leave law may apply to the same employee. An employee could potentially have rights under Washington’s paid sick leave law, the Family Care Act, PFML, or another state or federal employment law. Because these laws operate differently, you should determine which protections apply to your circumstances. If your employer denied family leave, interfered with your use of available paid leave, or retaliated against you after you requested or took protected leave, the James Hawkins Firm can evaluate your situation in a free consultation.
Vacation and paid time off are different from Washington’s statutory paid sick leave requirements. Washington generally does not require private employers to provide vacation leave or vacation pay. Instead, employers usually establish vacation and PTO benefits through a written policy, employment agreement, collective bargaining agreement, or other applicable arrangement. That does not necessarily mean an employer can ignore benefits it has promised.
When an employer agrees to provide vacation, PTO, or other paid-leave benefits, the specific language of the policy or agreement can matter greatly. Depending on the circumstances, an employer’s failure to provide promised benefits may give an employee grounds to pursue a legal claim.
Questions may include:
If your employer promised vacation or PTO and then refused to honor the benefit, our team can review your case to see whether you have a claim.
One of the most serious issues in a leave dispute is retaliation. Employees generally have the right to exercise legally protected leave rights without punishment. Retaliation may take many forms and is not necessarily limited to termination. Depending on the circumstances, an employee may have a potential retaliation claim if an employer:
The timing and circumstances surrounding the employer’s actions can be important. A termination shortly after an employee requests or uses protected leave, for example, does not automatically establish retaliation, but it may warrant closer examination. If your employment changed after you requested or used protected leave, don’t assume you have no legal options. Contact the James Hawkins Firm for a free consultation to discuss what happened.
In some circumstances, a leave or PTO dispute may affect a large group of employees rather than just one worker. A class action may be appropriate when an employer uses a common policy or practice that allegedly violates employees’ rights and meets the legal requirements for class treatment. Potential examples include:
An employer may use the same payroll, attendance, or leave-management system for hundreds or thousands of employees. If that system allegedly fails to provide employees with the amount of paid sick leave required by Washington law, the issue may affect a larger group.
A common compensation formula may also create broader issues. For example, if an employer consistently uses the same formula to calculate paid sick leave for a large group of employees and that formula allegedly does not comply with applicable Washington requirements, employees may have claims involving a common policy or practice.
A written vacation or PTO policy may create issues affecting many employees if an employer consistently fails to provide benefits promised under the same policy. The policy language, the employees affected, the employer’s practices, and the nature of the legal claims all matter when determining whether class treatment may be appropriate.
A common employer policy or practice that allegedly discourages employees from exercising legally protected leave rights may also raise broader legal issues.
When an employer’s unlawful leave or wage practices affect many employees, pursuing the claims together may offer important advantages. A class action lets employees with similar claims collectively challenge a company-wide policy or practice, rather than requiring each employee to pursue a separate lawsuit. This can make it possible to address widespread violations more efficiently, create greater leverage in negotiations, and seek recovery for employees who may otherwise be unlikely to pursue an individual claim because the amount owed to each person is relatively small.
Class actions can also help uncover and address systemic workplace practices. When the same payroll system, leave policy, compensation formula, or company-wide practice affects hundreds or even thousands of employees, a class action can seek relief based on the broader impact of that practice rather than focusing solely on one employee’s experience.
The remedies available in a Washington leave case depend on the laws involved, the employee’s circumstances, and the specific violations you can establish. Depending on the claim, potential remedies may include recovery of unpaid wages or leave benefits, statutory damages, other damages authorized by law, and reasonable attorney fees and costs. Washington’s Minimum Wage Act provides a private cause of action in certain circumstances and may allow an employee to recover amounts unlawfully withheld, along with applicable attorney fees and costs. Certain wage violations may also support enhanced or double damages when the statutory requirements are satisfied. The potential value of a case therefore may extend beyond the amount of unpaid sick leave or PTO itself. Retaliation, termination, wage violations, and other related claims can affect available remedies. Because available remedies depend heavily on the facts and applicable law, have our team review your situation before you assume your claim is worth only the amount of unpaid leave.
If you believe your employer violated your rights, preserving relevant evidence can be important. Keep copies of documents and communications related to your leave, including your employee handbook, sick leave, vacation, and PTO policies, employment agreements, pay stubs, time records, leave balances, leave requests, emails and text messages with supervisors or HR, disciplinary notices, performance reviews, schedule changes, termination or resignation documents, and other communications concerning your leave or benefits. Do not alter or delete relevant communications. If possible, preserve records in a way that does not violate your employer’s confidentiality, security, or other lawful workplace policies. You do not need to determine which law your employer may have violated before speaking with our team. Bring the facts and documents you have to a free consultation, and the James Hawkins Firm can help evaluate what happened, identify the legal issues that may apply, and explain your potential options.
For more than 25 years, the James Hawkins Firm has represented employees in employment-law disputes, including wage-and-hour claims, wrongful termination, and vacation and sick leave matters. As an employee-side law firm, we understand the challenges employees can face when standing up to an employer, particularly when the employer has greater resources and bargaining power.
Our attorneys investigate the circumstances, identify the laws that may apply, explain your legal options, and pursue the remedies available under the law. We understand that taking legal action can be intimidating, and we work to make the process as clear and straightforward as possible while protecting your interests.
If your employer denied legally required paid sick leave, failed to honor promised vacation or PTO benefits, improperly calculated your leave pay, disciplined you for a protected absence, or retaliated against you for exercising your workplace rights, you may have a legal claim. You do not have to navigate these issues alone. Contact the James Hawkins Firm today for a free consultation. Our experienced employee-side attorneys can review what happened, evaluate the laws that may apply, and help you understand your legal options.
Llámenos hoy (949) 387 – 7200
Si ellas son geniales 
Gente agradable; encontraron cosas más allá del despido improcedente.